Non-profit organisation to help tackle pending court cases, unnecessary legislation

ನಮ್ಮ ನ್ಯಾಯಪೀಠ ಪರ್ಯಾಯ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯವಲ್ಲ 'ಪೂರಕ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯ' ಎಂದು ಸಮರ್ಥಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು ನಿಮ್ಮ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಒಬ್ಬರು ಗೆಲ್ಲುತ್ತಾರೆ; ಮತ್ತೊಬ್ಬರು ಸೋಲುತ್ತಾರೆ.

A Delhi High Court project with the help of a Bengaluru-based NGO found that the National Capital Region requires 43 more judges to clear all the pending cases in one year.

NEW DELHI : A pilot project report by Delhi high court on backlog of cases has found that the national capital required 43 more judges above the current 143 to clear all pending cases in one year.

ಅಖಿಲ ಭಾರತ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಧೀಶರ ಸಂಘ ಮತ್ತು ಇತರರು ಹಾಗೂ ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ನಡುವಣ ಪ್ರಕರಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ ಆಗಸ್ಟ್‌ 2ರಂದು ನೀಡಿದ ತೀರ್ಪಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದು ವಿಷಯದ ಮೇಲೆ ಬೆಳಕು ಚೆಲ್ಲಿದೆ.

The link to Prajavani article: The results of the ADR-DAKSH Voter Survey, undertaken prior to the Karnataka Legislative Assembly Elections

Timely judicial intervention has often helped shape important policies. But recent judicial efforts to oversee legislative action have boomeranged.

The courts and police are the least-preferred mechanisms for resolving disputes in India, the finds.

Up to 55% of court time is spent by judges each day on tasks such as reissuing summons, fixing dates for future hearings and case administration decisions rather judicial functions such as hearings, a nation wide survey conducted by Bengaluru-based Daksh has found.

NEW DELHI: In a survey designed to assess citizens faith in the justice delivery system, 40% said they would not approach the police, 32% said they would not go to a lawyer and 22% showed aversion to approaching even village elders or local politicians for resolving their disputes.

Recently, it was reported that four States and one Union Territory, namely, Haryana, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, had managed to reduce pendency of 10-year old cases in lower courts to less than one per cent of total pendency.

ನ್ಯಾಯದೇವತೆಯ ಕಲ್ಪನೆ ನಮಗೆಲ್ಲ ಇದ್ದೇ ಇದೆ. ಒಂದು ಕೈಯಲ್ಲಿ ತಕ್ಕಡಿ, ಮತ್ತೊಂದರಲ್ಲಿ ಕತ್ತಿ, ಕಣ್ಣಿಗೆ ಪಟ್ಟಿ. ಪೂರ್ವಾಪರಗಳನ್ನೂ, ಉಭಯಪಕ್ಷಗಳ ವಾದ– ಪ್ರತಿವಾದಗಳನ್ನೂ ತೂಕ ಮಾಡಲು ತಕ್ಕಡಿ; ಶಾಸನಬದ್ಧ ಕಾನೂನನ್ನು ಕಾರ್ಯರೂಪಕ್ಕೆ ತರುವುದಕ್ಕೆ, ಕಾರ್ಯಗತವಾಗದಿದ್ದರೆ ದಂಡಿಸುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಕತ್ತಿ; ನಿಷ್ಪಕ್ಷಪಾತವನ್ನು ಕಣ್ಣಿನ ಪಟ್ಟಿ ಸಂಕೇತಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.