<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daksh Reference Archives - Daksh</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dakshindia.org/category/daksh-reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/category/daksh-reference/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-IN</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>India&#8217;s Next Investment Reform Should be Tax Certainty</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/indias-next-investment-reform-should-be-tax-certainty/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surya Prakash B.S,&nbsp;Anuja Maniar Shah&nbsp;and&nbsp;Almitra Rego ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=41846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a new opinion piece for Fortune India, DAKSH’s Surya Prakash B S, Anuja Maniar Shah and Almitra Rego examine India’s advance ruling mechanism and ask whether India can provide businesses, particularly non-resident investors, with tax certainty before commercial decisions become irreversible.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/indias-next-investment-reform-should-be-tax-certainty/">India&#8217;s Next Investment Reform Should be Tax Certainty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Best Judgments Result in Poor Outcomes</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/when-best-judgments-result-in-poor-outcomes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almitra Rego&nbsp;and&nbsp;Anuja Maniar Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=41840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Best judgment assessments under Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (and Section 271 of the new 2025 Act) are an important part of tax administration, allowing authorities to complete an assessment when a taxpayer does not participate. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/when-best-judgments-result-in-poor-outcomes/">When Best Judgments Result in Poor Outcomes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian courts are using AI without accountability. SC already caught one fake case law</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/indian-courts-are-using-ai-without-accountability-sc-already-caught-one-fake-case-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surya Prakash B.S,&nbsp;Angela Lusigi&nbsp;and&nbsp;Urvashi Aneja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=41835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Surya Prakash B S of DAKSH, Angela Lusigi of UNDP India and Urvashi Aneja of Digital Futures Lab, write about the use of AI in Indian courts for ThePrint.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/indian-courts-are-using-ai-without-accountability-sc-already-caught-one-fake-case-law/">Indian courts are using AI without accountability. SC already caught one fake case law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>e-Courts Phase III and the Next Test for Digital Justice in India</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/e-courts-phase-iii-and-the-next-test-for-digital-justice-in-india/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surya Prakash B.S&nbsp;and&nbsp;Smita Mutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=41830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>India’s eCourts Phase 3 is bringing more judicial processes online, with digital filing, virtual hearings, connected databases, AI-enabled tools, transcription, and many more.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/e-courts-phase-iii-and-the-next-test-for-digital-justice-in-india/">e-Courts Phase III and the Next Test for Digital Justice in India</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSTAT&#8217;s Real Challenge Is Not Backlog &#8211; It Is Transition!</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/gstats-real-challenge-is-not-backlog-it-is-transition/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C A Dhanashree Prabhu, Surya Prakash B S, Jatin Christopher & Vivek Jalan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=40932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AS the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) begins operations across India, it arrives at a time when concerns about global funds flow, working capital crunch, tax uncertainty, and judicial efficiency are increasingly shaping economic policy discussions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/gstats-real-challenge-is-not-backlog-it-is-transition/">GSTAT&#8217;s Real Challenge Is Not Backlog &#8211; It Is Transition!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Judicial Reforms Commission: A proposal we ignore at our peril [Part II]</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/national-judicial-reforms-commission-a-proposal-we-ignore-at-our-peril-part-ii/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justice Gautam Patel,&nbsp;Harish Narasappa,&nbsp;Surya Prakash B.S&nbsp;and&nbsp;Leah Verghese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=40927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The fundamental flaw is the absence of an institutional home for reform: a body empowered to take a comprehensive, long-term view of judicial transformation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/national-judicial-reforms-commission-a-proposal-we-ignore-at-our-peril-part-ii/">National Judicial Reforms Commission: A proposal we ignore at our peril [Part II]</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Judicial Reforms Commission: A proposal we ignore at our peril [Part I]</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/national-judicial-reforms-commission-a-proposal-we-ignore-at-our-peril-part-i/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justice Gautam Patel,&nbsp;Harish Narasappa,&nbsp;Surya Prakash B.S&nbsp;and&nbsp;Leah Verghese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=40922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For core and essential functioning, the judiciary must be treated as one unified system, not a federated coalition of wildly individualistic sub-systems.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/national-judicial-reforms-commission-a-proposal-we-ignore-at-our-peril-part-i/">National Judicial Reforms Commission: A proposal we ignore at our peril [Part I]</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>We’re not ready for ‘One Case One Data’. Court records are too unorganised for digitisation</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/were-not-ready-for-one-case-one-data-court-records-are-too-unorganised-for-digitisation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smita Mutt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=40918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No AI tool can reliably extract or interpret intelligible court documents without the contextualised human intelligence that created them. As a system, OCOD will be ripe with such files.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/were-not-ready-for-one-case-one-data-court-records-are-too-unorganised-for-digitisation/">We’re not ready for ‘One Case One Data’. Court records are too unorganised for digitisation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice in the time of algorithms</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/justice-in-the-time-of-algorithms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leah Verghese and Dona Mathew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=40908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to AI, courts must be better prepared to manage risks posed by a technology that is in a perpetual state of improvement.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/justice-in-the-time-of-algorithms/">Justice in the time of algorithms</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is tech adoption failing at the High Courts? The answer lies in process reforms</title>
		<link>https://www.dakshindia.org/why-is-tech-adoption-failing-at-the-high-courts-the-answer-lies-in-process-reforms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lakshmi Menon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daksh Reference]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dakshindia.org/?p=40894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Technology is adopted in a way that has contributed to the problems of litigation processes at High Courts, instead of simplifying them.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org/why-is-tech-adoption-failing-at-the-high-courts-the-answer-lies-in-process-reforms/">Why is tech adoption failing at the High Courts? The answer lies in process reforms</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.dakshindia.org">Daksh</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
